alinadbo

4 jours depuis -

This appeared in my mac's menu bar, somewhat randomly, while I had illustrator open. This was not while using the eyedropper tool, which I've seen mentioned elsewhere as the reason this might appear. It was actually just while I had a project open in a window, but was working on something else in an unrelated app.I quit Illustrator, which got rid of it in the menu bar, but it again reappeared randomly the next time I had Illustrator open. This time, when I closed the app, the "Adobe Illustrator 2025 is recording your screen" doesn't go away.I checked my settings/permissions, and I haven't granted Illustrator permission to record my screen in the first place, so this feels quite shady. Can anyone help explain what's going on here/why?
Hey Abhishek, thanks for the speedy response!I'm on Sequoia version 15.0 (24A335);I'll follow these steps and report back if the issue still persists. It took a day or so last time for the message to reappear, so I'll repond once I've had a reasonable window to properly test.Is there any reason why this message would be prompted in the first place, given that at no point was Illustrator granted permission in my Mac's settings to record my screen? That's the main point of concern for me
Anubhav,You are incorrect. This is happening in illustrator despite permission being denied /disabled. Additinoally, it happens if the eyedropper isnt used at all. It will occur if I simply run illustrator. Why is this happening despite being denied in the system settings?
I have a surface X, which I had the misfortune of finding out is not compatible with some adobe apps after purchasing second-hand. I'm a student, who used Illustrator for class and need to find an alternative that can work with this type of computer. Free would be the best since I am a sad, financially struggling, college student.
The only options will be what is in the Microsoft Store app. Developers are not making software for the Pro X series and you are stuck with what you have already,. Paint should be in the system which was re-released. You should already have it on the machine. Snip & Sketch has a few features as well.
Yeah, Adobe hasn't done much to support Windows on ARM past Photoshop. I just checked again, and there is not option to install Illustrator on my Pro X via the Creative Cloud app (which seems to be basically the way you get all their apps now).
My suggestion would be to inquire if your school has options to remotely use an school PC or virtual desktop that has Illustrator loaded on it. It's possible with COVID that your school had to deploy some sort of remote learning environment to facilitate students that either don't own Adobe software, or don't have a device that can run the software required for classes.
In doing some research on this, I think the problem isn't the ARM processor per say (since Windows 11 can now emulate x64 apps), but the GPU drivers and the fact that Illustrator uses OpenGL 4 (not part of Qualcomm's drivers) where as Photoshop uses OpenGL 3.2 Core. For the latter Microsoft wrote a compatibility pack to make Photoshop work on ARM devices and other systems that have no OpenGL support at all. I tried to see if Illustrator could somehow use that, but it refuses to install the one way I found to try to force it. Maybe someone with more knowledge with Adobe apps than I have could find a way, but that's as far as I got. cc7c31b456 jancor
https://sites.google.com/view/....why-buy-designer-jea
https://sites.google.com/view/....why-buy-dental-insur
https://sites.google.com/view/....why-can-39t-i-downl-
https://sites.google.com/view/....why-can-39t-i-downl-
https://sites.google.com/view/....why-can-39t-i-downlo

4 jours depuis -

To ensure correct operation of OpenGL use ChoosePixelformat,DescribePixelformat, GetPixelformat, SetPixelformat, and SwapBuffers,instead of the wgl equivalents, wglChoosePixelformat,wglDescribePixelformat, wglGetPixelformat, wglSetPixelformat, andwglSwapBuffers. In all other cases use the wgl function whereavailable. Using the five wgl functions is only of interest todevelopers run-time linking to an OpenGL driver.
My own testing indicates that "error: 2000" occurs on some systems (Nvidia, but not Intel or a Parallels VM) if the WGL version of these functions is called. Changing to the GDI version clears this issue, but using LoadLibrary("opengl32.dll" does not appear to change anything.
Has anyone ever investigated the difference between these WGL and GDI functions? It is clear that there is some form of difference, and I am trying to understand which version should be used under which circumstances and what are the potential pitfalls if the wrong version is used.
Edit: Wayback Machine brings up a webpage that describes how direct loading of an ICD works. This was apparently required back in the Voodoo 1/2 days when the 2D and 3D accelerators were two different pieces of hardware with separate ICDs (which the normal, single-ICD mechanism in opengl32.dll couldn't handle). Quake 1 and 2 would apparently load ICDs directly because of this.
This makes sense, since Mesa3D is not supposed to be used as an ICD. This fits with the pattern in the Mesa3D thread linked above: their calls are not being routed through Microsoft's opengl32.dll, so GDI functions fail, but Mesa3D is exporting wgl* functions so these still work. However, that's specific to Mesa3D - that method would fail if you tried to use AMD's ICD directly.
There is a huge difference, namely that the prototypes for the WGL functions are not defined in any system headers. opengl32.dll exports the symbols, but unless you manually import the functions you would never know this.
opengl32.dllis basically Microsoft's GDI implementation of OpenGL and a wrapper for ICDs. You can even see what an implementation of an ICD looks like if you look at Mesa; notice how none of the functions are prefixed with wgl? ICDs do not export any wgl-prefixed symbols, the WGL functions they do implement are all extensions (e.g. wglSwapIntervalEXT (...), wglChoosePixelFormatARB (...), etc.) and can only be loaded using wglGetProcAddress (...) or DrvGetProcAddress (...).
Now, ICDs do not actually implement ChoosePixelFormat (...), as it is functionally identical across all implementations. It is a simple pattern matching function. If you want to see how opengl32.dll dispatches one of its wgl... functions to an ICD at run-time, take a look at the control flow for wglSwapBuffers:
The red left-hand branch is what occurs when an ICD is installed and the green right-hand branch is the default GDI implementation of wglSwapBuffers. Interestingly, you can see that the GDI implementation requires a full glFinish (...). Most hardware drivers will tend to flush the command queue instead of finishing when you swap buffers, this allows better CPU/GPU parallelism.
Due to the (not relevant for this question) restrictions of OpenGL implementation in Virtualbox (only OpenGL version 1.1 available, but I need at least version 2. I decided to use software implementation in form of a DLL (named opengl32.dll) which can be downloaded from here:
Important notice: All the 32 bits applications need the file opengl32.dll from the directory /win32/ of this FTP server, while all the 64 bits applications need the file opengl32.dll (same name, but it's a different file!) from the directory /win64/. Thus if I have one 32 bit and one 64 bit application in a same directory on my computer, the solution of putting the DLL into the same folder doesn't work: it's not possible to have two different files with the same name in a same directory.
Note, that on Windows 10 original OpenGL32.dll files are only accessible by TrustedInstalle

4 jours depuis -

4 jours depuis -

4 années depuis -

4 années depuis -

4 années depuis -

0

0

0

0

0